Yesterday I started writing this article here (the one you are
reading now) but ended up writing about some other stuff as a prelude: Confessions of a dietitian. Today I am going to add to the discussion on the effectiveness of dietitians.
Put the trolleys in your mind (from yesterdays post, or here). One trolley illustrates what the
evidence says should be in our trolley to be healthy (proportions of fruit, veg, lean meat,
dairy, extras etc), the other trolley is what Australians actually put in their
trolley. There is clearly a gap (and a
rather big one) between what the evidence says to eat - ADG trolley, and what we do eat - Real-life trolley. The evidence-based (ADG) healthy trolley is what
dietitians are trained to support people to achieve. But when you look at the real-life trolley,
where would you start in trying to get people to achieve the healthy trolley?
Here is an excerpt from an early version of my thesis' abstract:
A problem for dietitians is that there is an
expectation their service will achieve the evidence-based health benchmarks of
a healthy body weight (BMI<25kg/m2), meet fruit and vegetable intake
targets, as well as exercise recommendations.
The expectation of a dietetic service exists despite the scientific
evidence that few or no interventions achieve such health targets (Franz 2007;
Cochrane 2010).
The central tenet of this thesis is that it is
likely dietitians do facilitate significant and measurable improvements to an
individual’s health, even where the improvements achieved fall well short of
the health benchmarks. There is evidence
the small health gains that are achieved may be clinically significant, and even
cost-effective (Dalton 1997; Sassi 2009).
And then I go on in the abstract and introduction to talk about
the problem my thesis is investigating which is about data: collecting and
reporting data from practice. Sure, I’ve
simplified “the problem” for this blog, and also, so there is some material
left to put in the final thesis *ahem*.
But whenever I have presented this work to dietitians, there is a real
sense of anxiety about reporting data from practice. This anxiety is because dietitians know when
it comes to achieving health improvements, especially weight – it is HARD, and
outcomes may not present as “effective” because the improvements are small, if
any.
The first point to make is: if we continue to not collect and
report data, we continue to keep doing what we are doing (and hope no one asks what we are doing or notices our existence). If we collect, report and
understand that data, we can start to build a practice-generated evidence-base
about what we do with this patient at this time in this clinic with this
dietitian. And we can then do better
(see hypothesis). To me, this IS
evidence based practice AND translational research. BAM.
Winning.
I’ve tweeted this catch phrase previously: “no data = no problems. but no solutions”
Not sure who first said it, but I took it from Chris Bain’s presentation we did together on a Vic State job (back in 2009). Thanks Chris, I've changed your quote a bit, Voevodin-style….where are you by the way?
The second point is: halting further weight gain is an important outcome, and a contribution to Australia's health statistics. Before doing this research, I was unconvinced "halting is good too" - but now, I am convinced it really is good. Evidence coming. I know, I am promising a lot.
In the first few months of my thesis, I was exploring
effectiveness of dietitians. Published
studies from practice was sparse as expected (given we aren’t routinely
collecting data yet), sure there were some RCTs looking at dietetic services
versus other health professional’s services, while other studies compared one
diet over another, but none stood out as THE intervention for weight
management. No real surprise there
either because the diet that works is the one you can stick to (Thomas 2008).
My work was not intended to find THE weight loss strategy and then
implement that system across dietetic services. My work is to be a step toward developing a system to record and report whatever it is
that dietitian does with that patient at that time, and have that data reported
back to the dietitian in a way that automatically generates useful data to
make clinical decisions: what works, why, and when to change/add/adjust.
There are many strategies to support people to achieve their
health goals. Dietitians are trained to
know all approaches, to critically assimilate the information, and then
translate that information for the person in front of them. We simply want an efficient system to capture what is done in the iterative exchange of information during a consultation.
A system that generates the evidence from practice is also a [critical]
reflective practice tool. The “evidence”
presented to the dietitian supports a “putting aside” of their own personal
philosophical approach that may be lurking and inadvertently influencing
practice (sure, I’m guilty). But also
allows a bravery to step outside our own attitudes, beliefs, and behaviour, because dietitians will now have in
front of them accurate, reliable, meaningful data on which to make the next
critical decision.
Epilogue
There is more to say about effectiveness of dietitians - in particular to highlight points from Dalton 1997 and Sassi 2009, and explain some economic modelling of health services. That to come (probably next week).PS. The data that went to build the trolleys was an analysis I did in 2010 using a previous paper we'd published (Kettings 2009) and then data from the ABS (2008) on household spending. Just so you know it's not made up....details will be in thesis or a later publication.
Tips du jour:
1. Embrace data, lets use it to our advantage
2. Practice-generated evidence is the new black lets be the first to do it
Other blogs by me
[Series] Trust in professional integrity (March 2014)
March is [unofficially] professional integrity month
The story of dietitians for professional integrity
What is professional integrity?
[Series] Are dietitians effective? (July 2013)
Heads up GPs, we can save $billions together
March is [unofficially] professional integrity month
The story of dietitians for professional integrity
What is professional integrity?
[Series] Are dietitians effective? (July 2013)
Heads up GPs, we can save $billions together
[Other stuff]
References
Cochrane Collaboration. Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese adults (Review) The Cochrane Library Issue 12, 2010 (see also Cochrane Collaboration. Long term non-pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2009; or any other review of weight loss interventions on Cochrane).
Dalton A, Carter R, Dunt D. The cost-effectiveness of GP-led behavioural change involving weight reduction: implications for the prevention of diabetes. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University Working Paper 65.
Franz MJ, JJ VanWormer, AL Crain, JL Boucher, T Histon, W Caplan, JD Bowman and NP Pronk. Weight-loss outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss clinical trials with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. JADA 2007 107:1755-1767
Kettings CM, AJ Sinclair and M Voevodin. A healthy diet consistent with Australian health recommendations is too expensive for welfare-dependent families Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2009; 33(6): 566-572
Sassi, F. et al. (2009), “Improving Lifestyles, Tackling Obesity: The Health and Economic Impact of Prevention Strategies”, OECD Health Working Papers, No. 48, OECD Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/220087432153
Sassi, F. et al. (2009), “Improving Lifestyles, Tackling Obesity: The Health and Economic Impact of Prevention Strategies”, OECD Health Working Papers, No. 48, OECD Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/220087432153
Thomas S, Hyde J, Karunaratne A, Kausman R, Komesaroff PA. "They all work...when you stick to them" A qualitative investigation of dieting, weight loss, and physical exercise, in obese individuals. Nutrition Journal 2008; 7:34
Irrespective of receiving daily oral or future injectable depot therapies, these require health care visits for medication and monitoring of safety and response. If patients are treated early enough, before a lot of immune system damage has occurred, life expectancy is close to normal, as long as they remain on successful treatment. However, when patients stop therapy, virus rebounds to high levels in most patients, sometimes associated with severe illness because i have gone through this and even an increased risk of death. The aim of “cure”is ongoing but i still do believe my government made millions of ARV drugs instead of finding a cure. for ongoing therapy and monitoring. ARV alone cannot cure HIV as among the cells that are infected are very long-living CD4 memory cells and possibly other cells that act as long-term reservoirs. HIV can hide in these cells without being detected by the body’s immune system. Therefore even when ART completely blocks subsequent rounds of infection of cells, reservoirs that have been infected before therapy initiation persist and from these reservoirs HIV rebounds if therapy is stopped. “Cure” could either mean an eradication cure, which means to completely rid the body of reservoir virus or a functional HIV cure, where HIV may remain in reservoir cells but rebound to high levels is prevented after therapy interruption.Dr Itua Herbal Medicine makes me believes there is a hope for people suffering from,Parkinson's disease,Schizophrenia,Lung Cancer,Breast Cancer,Lupus,Lymne Disease,psoriasis,Colo-Rectal Cancer,Blood Cancer,Prostate Cancer,siva.Fatal Familial Insomnia Factor V Leiden Mutation ,Epilepsy Dupuytren's disease,Desmoplastic small-round-cell tumor Diabetes ,Coeliac disease,Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease,Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Ataxia,Arthritis,Amyotrophic Lateral Scoliosis,Brain Tumor,Fibromyalgia,Fluoroquinolone Toxicity
ReplyDeleteSyndrome Fibrodysplasia Ossificans ProgresSclerosis,Alzheimer's disease,Adrenocortical carcinoma Infectious mononucleosis. .Asthma,Allergic diseases.Hiv_ Aids,Herpe ,Copd,Glaucoma., Cataracts,Macular degeneration,Cardiovascular disease,Lung disease.Enlarged prostate,Osteoporosis.Alzheimer's disease,
Dementia.(measles, tetanus, whooping cough, tuberculosis, polio and diphtheria),Chronic Diarrhea,
Hpv,All Cancer Types,Diabetes,Hepatitis,I read about him online how he cure Tasha and Tara so i contacted him on drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com / . even talked on whatsapps +2348149277967 believe me it was easy i drank his herbal medicine for two weeks and i was cured just like that isn't Dr Itua a wonder man? Yes he is! I thank him so much so i will advise if you are suffering from one of those diseases Pls do contact him he's a nice man.